Write the reason you're deleting this FAQ
It's funny but some people still don't know what "web 2.0 sites" are. Or what even makes a site a Web 2.0 site a Web 2.0 site in the first place. Let alone how they can help improve SERP ranking.
Wikipedia says that; "Web 2.0 describes World Wide Web sites that emphasize user-generated content, usability, and interoperability."
Types of Web 2.0 sites are social media sites and applications that include forums, micro blogging, social networking, social bookmarking, social curation, and wikis for example.
And considering how the majority of Web 2.0 sites are usually high authority sites which go on to provide better search engine rankings, why don't more people use Web 2.0 as a way to increase SERP ranking with seeing as they are all mostly free to use anyway?
It seems to me that Web 2.0 sites are mostly very overlooked and underrated by webmasters who are trying to improve their SERP ranking. Why is this?
I've personally seen better rankings when using Web 2.0 blogs because they're a platform that let you create a "home" on them that is basically a reflection of your website and then let you link to your site with is what's mostly a do follow link. Also these can rank highly on their own as well without even needing much SEO!
So why aren't more webmasters using them to increase SERP ranking with? Is it because they don't know what they are so much yet still? Or because of some other reason like having to actually build them and maintain them? Not that they take much maintenance - they are basically set-and-forget. You just create the account, choose a theme, add your content, images, videos etc and that's about it.
Plus they make such great tier 2 backlinks as well which you can link the life out of and if there's any adverse effect on them it only effects that Web 2 and not your actual site.
Whenever I'm building links to my new site. I always start with creating homes on the top Web 2.0 sites and blogs. It has to be done properly though. You can't just whack an article on them linking to your site and expect that to be enough. Although that's pretty much all there is to it. You don't want them to look "commercial" as though they have been created for that purpose only as usually they will get pulled down pretty quickly.
I just wonder why I don't see more emphasis being put into Web 2.0 sites by webmasters who want to increase their SERP ranking with. They're not like article directories that have mostly been deindexed or whacked by Google (EA for example). They rank high on their own and provide long lasting dofollow contextual backlinks to your site. So why don't more people use them in their link building techniques?
Are Web 2.0 sites being overlooked by people and do you think they can be effective at improving your SERP ranking with on their own or when used with other SEO methods?
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
Are you sure you want to delete this post?
TommyCarey
I do use web2.0 sites all the time in my linking campaigns for myself and clients. Sometimes it's easy to set up and execute but for highly difficult keywords it's not a one off thing you can do to increase to the top of the search results. I agree, they are great for tier 2 and help a ton in the long run.
If you have time, I'd suggest building some of your own Web2.0's and treating them like your own websites. I do this with a gaming niche, it's tough and time consuming, but I can now content with the top gaming websites out there like I'm one of the big players even though I work from my couch lol I do have people updating the sites everyday, but in the beginning it was just myself doing the 10 hours a day of posting, editing and moderating users and comments.
Start off with one of your own Web2.0's and see if you like it. I don't recommend starting off with 10 because you'll just get overloaded and hate it. Build up one and if you have enough to fund a VA to do the posting, editing and moderating I would highly recommend it. Treat it like an investment and you'll be happy you did in 6 months ;)
Thanks,
Razzy When Is started hearing about Web2.0 sites I always thought that the only ones were social platforms like facebook, twitter, pinterest, instagram, etc. lol :D I do use web2.0 sites all the time in my linking campaigns for myself and clients. Sometimes it's easy to set up and execute but for highly difficult keywords it's not a one off thing you can do to increase to the top of the search results. I agree, they are great for tier 2 and help a ton in the long run. If you have time, I'd suggest building some of your own Web2.0's and treating them like your own websites. I do this with a gaming niche, it's tough and time consuming, but I can now content with the top gaming websites out there like I'm one of the big players even though I work from my couch lol :D I do have people updating the sites everyday, but in the beginning it was just myself doing the 10 hours a day of posting, editing and moderating users and comments. Start off with one of your own Web2.0's and see if you like it. I don't recommend starting off with 10 because you'll just get overloaded and hate it. Build up one and if you have enough to fund a VA to do the posting, editing and moderating I would highly recommend it. Treat it like an investment and you'll be happy you did in 6 months ;) Thanks, Razzy
Are you sure you want to delete this post?