I think its a little like this i hope it helps you:
both are unethical. Some elements of "Gray Hat" search engine optimization can happen on their own, without the specific intention of "fooling" search engines - content duplication, for example - but most Gray Hat practices are outright dishonest. Some would argue that "Black Hat" SEO practices have potential for much quicker results, and that's probably true...if you don't get caught. Which means a higher risk for adverse consequences as well. But the point is that these are both methods to game the system and misrepresent a website's Internet presence, user interest, branding ubiquity, etc.
kind regards,
jeffDear Purna,
I think its a little like this i hope it helps you:
both are unethical. Some elements of "Gray Hat" search engine optimization can happen on their own, without the specific intention of "fooling" search engines - content duplication, for example - but most Gray Hat practices are outright dishonest. Some would argue that "Black Hat" SEO practices have potential for much quicker results, and that's probably true...if you don't get caught. Which means a higher risk for adverse consequences as well. But the point is that these are both methods to game the system and misrepresent a website's Internet presence, user interest, branding ubiquity, etc.
kind regards,
jeff
As far as I know Grey Hat SEO and Black Hat SEO are same thing. Some prefer to use Grey hat and some use Black Hat. Opposite of Grey/Black Hat is White Hat.
Grey/Black SEO tactics try to food search engines. However, people use these techniques because Grey/Black Hat is supposed to bring results pretty fast.As far as I know Grey Hat SEO and Black Hat SEO are same thing. Some prefer to use Grey hat and some use Black Hat. Opposite of Grey/Black Hat is White Hat.
Grey/Black SEO tactics try to food search engines. However, people use these techniques because Grey/Black Hat is supposed to bring results pretty fast.
jeffevil1
I think its a little like this i hope it helps you:
both are unethical. Some elements of "Gray Hat" search engine optimization can happen on their own, without the specific intention of "fooling" search engines - content duplication, for example - but most Gray Hat practices are outright dishonest. Some would argue that "Black Hat" SEO practices have potential for much quicker results, and that's probably true...if you don't get caught. Which means a higher risk for adverse consequences as well. But the point is that these are both methods to game the system and misrepresent a website's Internet presence, user interest, branding ubiquity, etc.
kind regards,
jeff Dear Purna, I think its a little like this i hope it helps you: both are unethical. Some elements of "Gray Hat" search engine optimization can happen on their own, without the specific intention of "fooling" search engines - content duplication, for example - but most Gray Hat practices are outright dishonest. Some would argue that "Black Hat" SEO practices have potential for much quicker results, and that's probably true...if you don't get caught. Which means a higher risk for adverse consequences as well. But the point is that these are both methods to game the system and misrepresent a website's Internet presence, user interest, branding ubiquity, etc. kind regards, jeff
Are you sure you want to delete this post?